Printer Friendly
E-Mail This Story
Summary of February 27, 2006 Board of Education Meetings
|
Budget Factoid: The old tables were in danger of collapse (and were held together with duct tape); the new ones allow the Board to create settings that facilitate discussion between Board members and with the public during committee meetings. February 27th Meetings:5:00 p.m. Legislative Committee (Ruth Robarts, chair) Current state law prohibits school districts from requiring developers to pay fees to support the building of new schools though other "impact" fees (for streets, sewers and parks) are allowed. The committee agreed that the district should work with the state school boards association to raise this issue. The committee adopted a statement that opposes the newly proposed TABOR amendment. 5:45 p.m. Special Board Meeting: The East Area Task Force members talked with the Board, explaining their recommendations and answering questions. They indicated that they would like a chance to meet and talk with the members of the Memorial/West Task Force and that the Board should consider ways to take advantage of both Task Force members because they now have so much knowledge about the district. The Board took the following actions on the East Task Force recommendations:
The Board did not take action on proposed boundary changes among the 4 north side schools but did ask the administration to come back with plans which showed options for combining all the children from the Packers Avenue townhouses in one school; currently the Packers children who need language services attend Linbergh and all the others attend Mendota. The Board discussed an analysis of the future uses of the Doyle Building; the analysis indicated that the potential sale value of the building was a net of $1.4 million; the costs of relocating current staff from Doyle to other buildings in the district (schools with space) would be over $8 million. The Doyle building has been designated, by the city, as a historic building and the land it is on is zoned conservancy. The Board asked the administration to investigate: a) the possibility of removing the landmark designation; b)how development of the Doyle site would fit into the neighborhood plan; and c)responsiveness of the city to changing the current zoning status of the site. Lastly, the Board discussed the existing policy on renewing administrator contracts. This topic was referred to the Human Resources Committee for further discussion. Return to MMSD Today |

